At oral arguments in the tariffs case, the conservative justices seemed ready to hit the president with the legal rationale ...

Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state.

Conservative justices have long embraced textualism and stressed that laws should be interpreted based on plain meaning. The ...

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments over President Donald Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on almost ...

The keenly awaited ruling should act as a ‘call to arms’ for a much-needed evolution of UK copyright law, says Rebecca Newman ...

Washington’s Supreme Court has ruled that flight attendants who catch COVID-19 while traveling for work can qualify for ...

Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. Loper Bright put an end to that model of deference. In so doing, it left in ...

The October 21, 2025, memorandum from the Office of Management and Budget’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) sets out an ...

The Court of Appeal held that repudiatory breaches can be remediable, adopting a practical approach to contractual ...

The White House urges agencies to fast-track repeals of “facially unlawful” rules using the Administrative Procedure Act’s ...

He's done his time. He's paid his dues. But Geoffrey Seymore contends his case is anything but moot, and the Illinois Supreme Court agreed — for good reasons related to the state's decision to abolish ...

If the Court blesses the president’s use of emergency powers to evade Congress, the consequences would be profound.