Trump’s threat to annex an autonomous part of Denmark has plunged NATO into an unprecedented situation: An alliance based on collective defense now faces the prospect that one member might attack another.

NATO is talking about improved Arctic security, says the alliance's secretary general. Some of those talks reportedly involve a European troop presence in Greenland. It's a remarkable turnaround for an alliance that has until recently tried to ignore the region.

Patria, Finland's biggest defense contractor, is scaling up production as it deals with an order backlog of over 1,000 vehicles from NATO allies.

A group of European countries, led by Britain and Germany, is discussing plans to boost their military presence in Greenland to show U.S. President Donald Trump that the continent is serious about Arctic security,

Britain is discussing with NATO allies how to enhance Arctic security against Russia and China. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said Sunday that these talks are routine and not a response to U.S.

As global power shifts, BRICS and NATO highlight contrasting strengths - NATO’s edge lies in military cohesion, while BRICS wields influence through population scale, economic growth and its push for a multipolar world order.

The Trump administration has repeatedly said the U.S. should be in control of Greenland, which is part of Denmark and NATO.

The notion of a possible U. S. attempt at seizing Greenland through force sounds unlikely at best, but recent statements have brought the topic from the fringes of policy discussions to the heart of contemporary debate.

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Worried about Trump's threats to pull America out of the alliance, NATO leaders agreed to spend 5% on defense. | Credit: Illustration by Stephen Kelly ...