SCOTUSblog on MSN
In tariff cases, verbs rather than major pronouncements about presidential power give the court the off-ramp it’s looking for
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state.
A court filing reveals Sam Altman asked Elon Musk's confidante if he should post praise for Musk on X amid rising tensions ...
Justices question whether the 1977 law Trump used to justify his tariffs actually allows the president to tax imports.
The high court is weighing in on a grotesque religious freedom violation meted out to a Rastafarian prisoner who thought he ...
The Constitution, the text of the relevant statute, and this Court’s past rulings argue against the president.
The Trump administration argued that the president had the authority to issue sweeping tariffs under a law reserved for use ...
Deseret News on MSN
Supreme Court hears arguments on religious liberty in prison
The justices heard oral arguments in Landor v. Louisiana, a case where a man's religious rights in prison were 'egregiously' ...
American history, when told well, resists the tidy progressions we like to imagine for it. Two recent works -- Ken Burns and ...
The justices agreed to hear a challenge to Mississippi’s law, a case that could upend similar measures in dozens of states before the 2026 election.
18hon MSNOpinion
How Elon Musk’s Changes to X Made Our Discourse Far Stupider
To celebrate 25 years publishing thanks to our members, we’re taking $25 dollars off the annual price of any TPM membership ...
Tech Xplore on MSN
AI evaluates texts without bias—until the source is revealed
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used not only to generate content but also to evaluate it. They are asked to ...
Until now, the U.S. Supreme Court has been modestly deferential to President Donald Trump’s executive overreach. Oral ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results