The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in a case that could impact what’s needed for law enforcement to enter your ...
The Fourth Amendment protects "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against ...
WASHINGTON (Gray DC) - The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in “Case v. Montana” Wednesday, a case tied to the Fourth ...
SCOTUSblog on MSN
Court to consider circumstances in which police may enter a home during an emergency
The Fourth Amendment generally requires police officers to obtain a warrant before they enter a home. But the Supreme Court ...
The Supreme Court will deliver a decision about what situations are deemed emergencies and allow police to bypass needing a ...
William Trevor Case sought to suppress evidence at trial obtained after officers entered his home, without a warrant, based on concerns that he posed a threat to himself.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has acknowledged that Section 3755 was “inartfully drafted” because it “required a probable ...
The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared ready to side with police officers in Case v. Montana, a Montana man’s challenge to a ...
Judge reverses ruling and writes "the plain smell doctrine can no longer establish probable cause based solely on the odor of ...
Opinion
1monOpinion
The Supreme Court erased the Fourth Amendment by OK’ing Trump’s immigration sweeps
Once a constitutional principle is treated as negotiable for one group — Latino communities in this case — it becomes weaker for all of us.
What is needed is for the courts to act — to declare masked arrests unconstitutional, as unreasonable seizures barred by the ...
Should a simple call to emergency services be enough to justify sending heavily armed officers into someone's home?
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback